Return to LSU's Strategic Position: Updates on Major Strategic Initiatives
K-12 Task Force Report
THE CHARGE
At the initial meeting of the Task Force on January 27, 2000 Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Daniel Fogel reiterated his written charge to the Task Force:
Chancellor Emmert and I are looking forward for action steps and strategies that will effectively demonstrate LSU's commitment to children, families, and schools and to the lifelong development of the human resources of Louisiana. Operating downstream of K-12 education, LSU cannot advance among the nation's public research universities unless K-12 education also advances, nor will LSU be able to recruit and retain greater numbers of highly talented faculty and staff if they do not find local and regional communities supportive of the high aspirations we would expect them to have for the education of their families.
The Task Force itself was comprised of not only LSU faculty members, staff representatives, and administrators, but also members from the community involved in education. It included two teachers, two K-12 principals/heads, a member of the East Baton Rouge School Board, an associate superintendent of the East Baton Rouge School Board, and a member of the Louisiana Board of Regents and Governor's Task Force on Education. (View a list of membership.)
THE ISSUES
For the first two weeks the Task Force members sharedwith considerable passiontheir views of the problems facing K-12 education in Louisiana. These reflected the national debate about education generally:
LSU'S ROLE IN FACING THESE ISSUES
The Task Force realized of course that the great issues facing education today cannot be solved by LSU alone, but it also acknowledged that LSU can participate in finding solutions to them. The Task Force knew that LSU is already involved in a great many activities to improve K-12 education, and that some have received national attention, LSYOU and the Molecular Biology Outreach Program being two examples. However, no one, not even the most knowledgeable of the Task Force Members, knew more than a small part of LSU's commitment. Without some awareness of current efforts, the Task Force could not make intelligent recommendations on how LSU could do more. So, it decided that one task would be to create as comprehensive an inventory as possible of the university's outreach programs. The inventory lists 150 projects representing every college and major unit on the campus. It undoubtedly is not complete because so much remained unreported, and within a few months it will be obsolete. Nonetheless, the Task Force members believed that it constituted an impressive list of projects and programs that have involved many students, faculty members, and staff members. (View the K-12 Inventory.)
How to maintain such an inventory led in turn to the Task Force considering what mechanism could be put in place not only to maintain such an inventory, but to coordinate some of the outreach programs, to identify new programs, to make certain that those programs were of benefit to K-12 education (by creating a cooperative and mutually beneficial atmosphere with K-12 schools), and to seek funding to make new projects possible. The Task Force agreed that the focus of this mechanism should not be limited to K-12 education, but should involve pre-school programs as well and extend through to college and even to graduate school. K-12 itself was too limited; pre-K-16 would be more appropriate.
A subcommittee was charged with the task of identifying the necessary components of this mechanism. Of specific interest sere the questions:
The result was the Task Force's proposal that the University establish what we have entitled the LSU Institute for Partnerships in Education (LSUIPE). We propose that this office be a university-wide office answerable to the Provost and to the Chancellor. In broad strokes, its function will be to:
A third subcommittee conducted an experiment in how such an office would work in the most practical way possible: it composed and submitted a grant proposal, completed in June, was a US Department of Education Gear-Up Grant in the community partner component of the competition. (View the LSUIPE proposal.) The proposal is for $2,043,187 in federal funds (total project cost with matches is $4,797,404) and is a collaborative effort between East Baton Rouge Parish and LSU with several community and industrial partners. The proposal takes advantage of resources throughout the LSU campus and would be specifically aimed at high-risk middle school students with the specific goal of finding interventions that would make these students more likely to be prepared to enter and to graduate from college. The grant application demonstrated that, with appropriate structure and people in place (in this case the Task Force subcommittee), we can effectively marshal resources across the University.
OBSERVATIONS
This Task Force completed its deliberations in light of another very important but completely independent activity. The Board of Regents and the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education recently formed a Blue Ribbon Commission on Teacher Quality. This group was working under the charge "to recommend policies that lead to a cohesive PK-16+ system that holds universities and school districts accountable for the aggressive recruitment, preparation, support, and retention of quality teachers who produce higher achieving K-12 students." Our Task Force has been fully informed of all the Blue Ribbon Commission's activities, as Frances Henry, a member of the Blue Ribbon Commission and of the Board of Regents, served actively in our group. We would like to acknowledge her efforts. The Blue Ribbon Commission has developed a set of numerical criteria by which all the universities in the state will be judged. The standards are aimed at assessing teacher recruitment and preparation. Included is a mandated organizational reporting structure that will have to be met by the University when the Commission's recommendations are complete. Our group consciously avoided working toward that end and is simply making recommendations we think appropriate to LSU and its community partners. However, we are aware that the recommendations made here do in fact predispose the University to providing an acceptable solution to the organizational guidelines that will be required to respond to the Commission's recommendations. We think that this further suggests that our recommendations are timely, and, if implemented successfully, should allow LSU to respond with its own internal plan that has the benefit of meeting the requirements of an external reporting agency.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Return to LSU's Strategic Position: Updates on Major Strategic Initiatives
About LSU | LSU A - Z | Directory | Search | Contact LSU | LSU Home |
| Louisiana
State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Internet 2 University Member |