Ghosts of the South

by S. T. Joshi

Austin, Sherry. Mariah of the Spirits and Other Southern Ghost Stories. Johnson City, TN: The Overmountain Press, 2002. 181 p.


In Mariah of the Spirits , Sherry Austin’s first collection, we are presented with thirteen ghostly tales set chiefly in the South—whether it be the author’s native North Carolina, or New Orleans, or Atlanta, or other Southern gothic sites. Wisely, Ms. Austin places most of her tales in rural or remote coastal locales where the incursion of the weird seems an almost natural consequence of the forlorn decay brought on by abandonment and the wistful pathos of glory days long past. As the author states in her introduction, “. . . the Old South of some of these stories is itself a ghost . . . .”
    
In the Southern gothic, one should not expect the blood-and-thunder spectres of a Stephen King or Clive Barker, or even the subtler but nonetheless aggressively violent wraiths of M. R. James and his ilk. Instead, Ms. Austin’s tales evoke the faded delicacy of a Mary Wilkins-Freeman, or the topographical rootedness of Sarah Orne Jewett, or an emphasis on searing personal and domestic tragedy, a la Fred Chappell (who has supplied a justifiably cordial blurb to a fellow North Carolinian). In prose of admirable suppleness and pungency, Ms. Austin can introduce the weird with a subtlety that makes her noisier contemporaries in the horror field seem clumsy and clownish.
    
Ms. Austin never loses sight of the fact that a ghost is chiefly a metaphor—a symbol for some human drama whose plangency is enhanced by the evocation of the supernatural. Hence, in the story “The Other Woman,” we find the doppelgänger motif used to good effect to emphasize marital discord. “Come, Go Home with Me” tells with extraordinary delicacy of the end of an old man’s life and his recognition that the time for him to join the ghosts of his past has come. The supernatural is reduced almost to the vanishing point in “Lost Soul,” but this tale captures with heart-rending eloquence the pangs of youthful love and rejection. A very different type of story is “The Dressmaker’s Mannequin,” a whimsy that is almost reminiscent of Lord Dunsany (I think particularly of his tale “Blagdaross,” in A Dreamer’s Tales) in its depiction of the shifting thoughts and moods of a mannequin in a New Orleans curio shop.

Not every tale, perhaps, is equally successful. Several attempt a revivication of the days of Southern slavery, but only the title story is effective in its grim account of an African-American mother who seeks to prevent the execution of her rebellious son. As a grammatical purist I also find the bland and repeated use of “alright” highly offensive. No matter how widespread this solicism becomes (and I confess to finding it in at least two of the last three books I have reviewed), it will always remain a solicism. Ms. Austin also hurts her cause by maintaining in her introduction that, although she is “both a skeptic and a believer” as far as ghostly phenomena are concerned, the frequency with which such phenomena are found in folklore (and particularly in sacred texts) represents “a great cloud of witnesses to an ancient and enduring belief.” I am not sure what she is asserting here; surely the universality of a belief is no guarantor of its truth. Prior to 1450 there was a pretty universal belief that the sun revolved around the earth.
    
But these are small blemishes in a book that is on the whole a highly creditable first offering to the literature of the weird. Ms. Austin is quite skilled in the short story, and seems to understand that ghostliness is most effective in short compass. I for one would be interested to see if she can maintain her distinctive atmosphere of quiet pathos in a novel. But whether her next work is a novel or another collection of tales, there is every reason to suppose it will be worth reading.


Home