Meeting Index
- Society Members
- Newsletter No.XXVII
- Annual Meeting Papers 2012
- Annual Meeting Papers 2011
- Annual Meeting Papers 2010
- Annual Meeting Papers 2009
- Annual Meeting Papers 2008
- Annual Meeting Papers 2007
- Annual Meeting Papers 2006
- Annual Meeting Papers 2005
- Annual Meeting Papers 2004
- Annual Meeting Papers 2003
- Annual Meeting Papers 2002
- Annual Meeting Papers 2001
- Annual Meeting Papers 2000
- Annual Meeting Papers since 1985
Eric Voegelin Society Meeting 2009
Eric Voegelin: Master Teacher
Copyright 2004 Barry Cooper
Although I am the chairman of this panel and so strictly neutral on all things, and although I was never one of Voegelin's pupils, I would like to begin by reading a few remarks by others who knew Voegelin as a teacher.
Asked whether he got along fairly well with female students, Robert Heilman answered: "I think so, I think so, yes. He was a very courtly man. To which they would respond favourably, even though they knew there was no prospective seducer there."
To the same question, Klaus Vondung replied: "Well, he treated them as students with respect to their intellectual performance. In this respect, he didn't make any difference between all the students. And, you probably know that two of his most brilliant students - the Herwig sisters, Dagmar and Hedda Herwig - they really were, and still are, brilliant minds. So, with respect to the intellectual performance, I think he didn't make any difference. On the other hand, with respect to personal attitudes, well he certainly was more conservative in his attitude. Because he thought that, if one wants to be a real scholar, one has to devote all of one's energy to scholarship. And then, finally, there is also private life; but if there is a conflict, always scholarship comes first. That was a rather strict attitude."
I would be interested to hear what members of the panel might say about Voegelin's treatment of his female students. However: let us hear from them.
Ernest Walters was an undergraduate student of Voegelin and a grad student with Strauss. This is what he said: "Voegelin was the first scholar I ever knew. He really was. I had some good teachers in physics (also had some rotten ones), but nothing like Voegelin. And the business of analyzing a text - you know, I can remember, we would read just two or three sentences in St. Augustine, and Voegelin would just go on and on and on about it. And everything he said was right! I couldn't believe he could get that much out of a text. And then the same thing occurred with Strauss."
Clause Brsch, one of Voegelin's German students, said, "he was
very ironical. Really a sense of
humour. And he used lots allusions
- to poets, and such; it was an ironic style, an ironic...wittiness, very much
wittiness, spirit. And he looked
in my eyes, into my eyes like the young Grimm, Gustav Grimm - so it was a
typical
Cooper:
Who is Grimm?
Brsch: Gustav Grimm is one of the famous, famous German actors in the '20s, at the end of the '20s, and after the war. He was a very famous; he was famous through all the world, his Mephisto. And his lectures were not like a typical German professor. The German professor gives a lecture, okay. The End. Voegelin made a break. He smoked a cigar. And, it was possible to ask him questions! And he answered. He really answered. He was quite different; he was a little bit distanced, ironic. But also, he was very polite, very polite.
You must understand Voegelin was not born a pedagogue.
If a student, girl or boy, asked a question, really a question...he had
patience. If the question was an
intelligent question, and not only a rhetorical question, he was very patient.
For example: a friend of
mine, he was a fan of Fichte, a fan
of Fichte. And you know,
Fichte was one of the "enemy." And
it was a dialogue; he asked Voegelin and Voegelin answered, he asked Voegelin
back, Voegelin answered. He was
really patient, and he was friendly
to him. But if any student asked
something stupid, really stupid, without ground, with only a rhetorical sense,
you know...he was very very rude. He
didn't say, "well, this is an interesting question..." but something
else
